As per my normal I am on a break after 35 days in a row. Writing that is. My idea of a break isn’t a full-on no writing at all break. It means that I probably write half the days instead of every day.
Interesting day today. I may actually write about it on my other blog.
Consider taking a break when you need to. I also recommend doing it every other day instead of not doing it at all.
Whatever it is that you want to do.
This is getting exciting now. I was just going to do a little blurb here. This would be weird if I actually wrote 2000 words here before midnight Pacific.
I just watch Californication for the very first time. It’s different. Not for everybody. But definitely not boring.
Maybe I’ll just wander off to bed now. Or not.
Our son came home a few minutes ago and came right over and gave me a hug.
Amazing what one thing can do to brighten your day. Even if it’s almost over.
Maybe that’s the best way to end this and get to bed in a great mood.
If you’re a regular reader of my writing on this blog, AOO, you might be wondering about what does this all mean?
Unfortunately for you I am engaged in an exercise to write and keep writing and get to that place where it flows out of me more readily. I learned this idea from Julia Cameron’s The Artist’s Way. One of these days I’ll learn more about typing in italics, too, so I can more properly make the titles of books and/or movies standout.
What happens here is more for my benefit than yours. I apologize.
There can be some extra benefit if you want to look over what I’ve written in approximately two months so you can decide if you want to embark on a similar journey. You will be missing some of my writing which is a private blog containing my writing for two science fiction stories/novels.
But for now, tonight, here we are. I’m typing and I keep typing unless I get interrupted by a technical glitch that just happened. Does anyone have any idea why that happens and how to avoid it? I’m just guessing that my fingers are a little too big for this keyboard.
Here’s what happens: I’m typing along and all of a sudden the cursor jumps and often this happens in the middle of a word so I end up typing “going to the movies” as going to the mhistoryovies and then I have to go back and change it.
It just did it again as I started this sentence. The cursor was in between the and mhistoryovies in the sentence above and I just happened to catch it as I hadn’t started to type the next word yet. THAT time it really just seemed random and I didn’t notice hitting a particular key or any key for that matter. But it happens so fast when it happens that it is really hard to know if it was cause by me or it’s some sort of technical or programming glitch that someone has figured out somewhere. Just not me.
I did notice it on an even smaller computer with a smaller keyboard and it happened much more often than it does on this one. That’s partly why I believe it could be related to my big fingers.
Oh well…if you know something, please let me know. Sometimes I laugh about it and sometimes I’m not in that light of a mood.
Lighten up. You must have heard someone say that to you at some time or another.
People talk about being “light” and what I’m referring to is your mood or your attitude.
Sometimes I can just snap my fingers and do this and other times it is truly difficult.
I used to know a man who talked about “getting out of your head” and I think I understand that pretty well AND sometimes it seems to be easier said than done. I don’t think I have the idea down perfectly as I wonder about the need to be in my head in order to write some of the stories I want to write. Perhaps all of them. 🙂
Today I was not “light”. I felt pretty – there it did it again and I don’t think I was touching the keyboard. Please, please let me know if you have this problem sometimes and you’ve figured out how to stop it. I’m trying to recall if my HP had this problem, but now it seems like it’s been happening forever. LOL
I’m also interested in hearing from authors about how many books you sell each year – either by you or other retailers. One of the things that has occurred to me recently is that if you could write two books a year that sold 2,000 copies a year, you could have good to great residual income over time. If one of your works turned out to sell 50,000 or 100,000 copies, you’d be doing pretty well.
Many, many people are working on creating residual income and I don’t think I’ve heard anyone talk about that with respect to books. I’ve heard and seen presentations about different products that are sold my network marketing companies. Nothing wrong with that, but writing does allow you more creativity and I find that to be a bonus! Also, if you have the means, buying a property and renting it out is a type of residual income if you are covering the mortgage payment and you keep a tenant in there.
What if you wrote a book about something that you knew there was a market for and it didn’t necessarily strike you as quite as creative as a work of fiction or something you had to research like Truman Capote’s In Cold Blood? Let’s say that you write one book a year that really causes you to “go to the well” of your creativity and one book about say, “How to create a website for your small business using WordPress” or something like that.
When you KNOW that there’s a market for a book and it’s not necessarily your heart’s desire, but a way to make income, maybe you should consider writing a book like that every other book or every fourth book.
I’m sure that adds up over time.
This is not in any way an attempt to kill anyone’s dreams. If you are writing and making the income you want to from writing, that’s great. However, if you aren’t making as much income from writing as you would like, perhaps a strategy like that would allow you to hold onto your artistic integrity (however YOU see that) and create more income so that in the long run you can devote more time to the thing that you really love. I’m assuming that at least part of that thing you really love is, in fact, writing.
You can also do something else to make money while you write completely and utterly the exact stuff you want to write regardless of how well it sells. I’m not saying one way is better than another. Whatever works for you.
Be careful that it actually does work, however.
You are free to choose just like me.
I freely chose to step out in faith a couple months ago and write and then write more and write consistently and soon I’ll be consistently writing more. I do expect to have one science fiction novel published by December 30th and another book about redemption published by the same date.
This process of writing these “morning pages” as Julia Cameron calls them has helped me think about my writing as well. I’m practicing writing without judgement and look at it simply as a way to learn. Insights are a bonus.
If what you are doing is working and you’re not doing morning pages, that is fantastic.
If you would like to get more of your creativity out into the world for others to see and it’s not happening in the way you would like, I urge you to do morning pages even if it’s 4 o’clock in the afternoon.
So here I am on a Sunday night and I’ve had a restful day which my wife let me have because I woke up and my bones ached. I rarely take anything and I took some Advil earlier today. I feel better than I did earlier and yet I considered not writing tonight. I knew I could blame it on not feeling well.
Yet I really want to make this happen and I decided to just get down to it a little while ago.
I urge you to have a writing discipline. It does not have to be like mine.
What will work for you? If you’re looking for something and you’re trying different things, remember:
Morning pages are always available to you. Waiting for you, even.
Join the battle!
Maybe you’ll want to join the discussion at Gary Vanucci’s Eye On Ashenclaw – Homage or Lack of Creativity? – January 24, 2012 – IF you can!
I have resorted to posting a comment this way because I kept getting this response:
URL contains illegal characters
Joe Eszterhas said that you don’t want to remake a movie unless you can improve it. When something was good or especially great in the first place, this is a tall order. Usually, many of those involved are interested in the potential boatload of money from a built-in audience and don’t care or realize that their remake is not as good as the original.
Yet I really enjoyed Battlestar Galactica on SyFy and see it as a vast improvement over the original, regardless of whatever nostalgic affection we might have for the campy Lorne Greene vehicle.
The Hunger Games trilogy has been a pleasant surprise and that goes double for Alma Katsu’s The Taker, which I posted about on my AOO Authors, Offers And Others blog.
So, I guess the answer for me is – It depends on how good it is.
Maybe I’ll update Heinlein’s The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress one of these days. Or maybe there are people out there with more literary knowledge who will tell me that The Hunger Games or Alma Katsu are derivative, but I don’t realize it because I haven’t seen or read the original media. That’s what I sometimes try to explain to my son when I tell him I’m not impressed with a lot of music today. Didn’t my parents say that? 😉